T1568: Dynamic Resolution
AI Answer
Adversaries may dynamically establish connections to command and control infrastructure to evade common detections and remediations. This may be achieved by using malware that shares a common algorithm with the infrastructure the adversary uses to receive the malware's communications. These calculations can be used to dynamically adjust parameters such as the domain name, IP address, (Source: MITRE ATT&CK T1568)
ATT&CK Mapping
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Technique ID | T1568 |
| Name | Dynamic Resolution |
| Tactic | Command and Control (command-and-control) |
| Platforms | ESXi, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Sub-technique | No |
Why it matters
In the OpenTrojan knowledge graph, Dynamic Resolution (T1568) is one of the highest-connectivity ATT&CK techniques: 24 MITRE STIX relationships reference this technique; 8 threat groups observed using it; 10 software families associated; 6 campaigns associated. These counts are derived from MITRE ATT&CK STIX relationships and are not an estimate of exploitation volume.
How attackers use it
Behavior described below is from the MITRE ATT&CK canonical definition (source: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1568). Adversaries may dynamically establish connections to command and control infrastructure to evade common detections and remediations. This may be achieved by using malware that shares a common algorithm with the infrastructure the adversary uses to receive the malware’s communications. These calculations can be used to dynamically adjust parameters such as the domain name, IP address, or port number the malware uses for command and control. Adversaries may use dynamic resolution for the purpose of Fallback Channels. When contact is lost with the primary command and control server malware may employ dynamic resolution as a means to reestablishing command and control.
Detection
Not available — MITRE ATT&CK does not currently publish a structured detection strategy for this technique in the ingested dataset.
Mitigation
Use intrusion detection signatures to block traffic at network boundaries.
Mitigation guidance is from the MITRE ATT&CK course-of-action associated with this technique.
Related Software
- BRICKSTORM
- Tomiris
- NETEAGLE
- Bisonal
- RTM
- SUNBURST
- Maze
- Gelsemium
- AsyncRAT
- Remcos
Software associations are from MITRE ATT&CK STIX relationships (observed usage, not attribution).
Related Threat Groups
- Kimsuky
- RedEcho
- Gamaredon Group
- TA2541
- BITTER
- APT29
- APT-C-36
- Transparent Tribe
Group associations are from MITRE ATT&CK STIX relationships.
Related Campaigns
- Operation Dust Storm
- Indian Critical Infrastructure Intrusions
- Operation Spalax
- SolarWinds Compromise
- Night Dragon
- C0026
Campaign associations are from MITRE ATT&CK STIX relationships.
References
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1568
- http://blog.talosintelligence.com/2017/09/avast-distributes-malware.html
- https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/03/dissecting_one_ofap.html
- https://www.welivesecurity.com/2017/12/21/sednit-update-fancy-bear-spent-year
- https://datadrivensecurity.info/blog/posts/2014/Oct/dga-part2
Source Attribution
Source: MITRE ATT&CK (MITRE ATT&CK) · Confidence: 0.9 · Reviewed: OpenTrojan - Human Review
Start Investigation
Move from reading to investigating T1568 Dynamic Resolution. The workspace is a structured analysis surface — not a chat — organised as:
- Question — what do you need to know about T1568 Dynamic Resolution?
- Evidence — assertions mapped to verifiable references.
- Timeline — events in chronological order.
- Related Entities — CVE, threat actor, campaign, malware links.
- Sources — NVD, CISA KEV, MITRE ATT&CK, vendor advisories.
- Notes — your own observations and working hypotheses.
AI assistance is limited to summarising, explaining, and suggesting related evidence. AI never completes your investigation, modifies entity relationships, or generates facts — all published analysis stays human-reviewed.